I am not bagging on photographers who shoot multiple frames per second. In fact, I am sure that there are genres of photography where something like this is very helpful.
I typically don't. In fact, I have my K-7 set so that in only takes one picture at a time.
But, on this particular photo I did have is so that it would shoot as fast and many as the camera allowed me to.
What I do have issues is that there are people out there who complain that 5 to 6 frames per second that K-7 does is not good enough. I don't get that. When is it going to be enough???
Pentax K-7
DA 70/2.4 ltd
1/90 @ f/3.5
0 ev
ISO 400
RAW
I agree - 5 lame photos a second is plenty for me. Now, if the K7 could focus faster on my lame subjects I would be very happy.
ReplyDelete-Mark
Hi, Mark
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. Glad you agree with me. Speaking of AF, I tried out 645D the other day, and that theng focuses faster than shit. They old me it will be incorporated on the next DSLR model too.